Submission | World Bank framework for engagement with palm oil should focus on poverty reduction

by Tim Wilson, August 23, 2010

The World Bank is currently completing a consultation on its financing of palm oil projects. Central to the World Bank’s draft is the obligation for certification of palm oil plantations against developed world environmental and social management standards. There is nothing wrong with sustainability certification for agriculture production. But extra costs and regulations will come at the expense of poverty reduction. Sustainable Development has made a submission highlighting it doesn’t oppose voluntary certification, but it opposes compulsory obligations for financing. The submission can be found here.

7 Responses to “Submission | World Bank framework for engagement with palm oil should focus on poverty reduction”

  1. sally says:

    tim, hate to sat this but when you appeared on insight you looked like the cliched type trendy that said i am from melbourne i voted greens chaser skit when you said i am victorian,careful what you say on tv next time, have a nice day!!

  2. janice walters says:

    http://neoskosmos.com/news/en/Mad-men-Melissa-Chrys-fashion-1960s-smoking
    Sorry to go off on tangent but..

    Tim ,this article may sum up that WONDERFUL photo of you in the Australian in terms of style and your politics…
    it’s all good ;) ;)

  3. PENNY JAMES says:

    Dear Tim,
    Could you please kindly incorporate Udo Voigt into your article and books series at i.p.a hun?

  4. hayley thomas says:

    If i.p.a believe in anarcho-capitalism,family and no society and we are all “corporate citizens” should we start barcoding babies and little kids on their foreheads as some will be conceived for monetary value only..?

  5. hayley thomas says:

    Individual anarchy might lead to rape being normal for those who think it’s ok when they abuse this concept amomgst many other things to numerous to mention here…

  6. dave says:

    the preppy dress style is so old Tim, take note of less is more ok…

    cheers mate!

Leave a Reply